Is is possible to synthesize the element plutonogen? If not, what is the most “powerful element ever” not yet listed on the periodic table?
I have provided a chart that will hopefully help clarify last week’s question.

Is is possible to synthesize the element plutonogen? If not, what is the most “powerful element ever” not yet listed on the periodic table?
I have provided a chart that will hopefully help clarify last week’s question.

Charts, links and quotes are acceptable in your answer.
The Ameviathan script we will be shooting will be “The Green Machine”. Though we are still looking into filing for profit or non-profit status for the film-making future, “The Green Machine” will not receive third-party funding.
There are a couple reasons for this. With a 20 to 30 minute length video, there isn’t any sort of shelf life for the current incarnation of “Ameviathan” outside of the realm of television show. And with the the heyday off Sid and Marty Kroft (rather sadly in my mind) behind us, there also isn’t any real hope of a major bidding war for airing rights breaking out any time soon.
As such, “The Green Machine” will be S.T.I. (straight to internet), and see release here exclusively on Protozoic. However, none of this means that the our goals for “The Green Machine” are any less lofty. Technically, “The Green Machine” will represent the most complicated thing we’ve done to date, in terms of the writing process, pre-production, production and post-production.
This week, Tim and myself have started with a thorough read-through of the the screenplay, making some appropriate decisions. Next, I’ll start story-boarding and Tim will look into lighting. Meanwhile, Brian will harvest ants from our yard.
As for the future: We will continue to look into filing for non-profit or profit status and I will continue working towards the completion of a feature length script. At the current time, I am still working on producing treatments for potential ideas, though I think I’ve landed on the idea I’ll be developing. Brian’s plans for the future will remain steadfast: the ant-opian dream.
My boss grew a bunch of zucchinis in his garden a couple weeks ago and managed to foist them upon the staff. I ended up with one that sat in our refrigerator for quite awhile. Sadly due to our poor eating habits many vegetables sit in our freezer until bad things happen to them (other foods sit there for a long time too but happen to have a higher endurance).
Fortunately a recent visit to our relatives (just before the too-brief NJ stop) netted us several of grandma dragon’s recipees including a bread that actually involves zucchini. Attempts on my part to prepare a sustaining loaf of the same returned various results.
Recipees and commentary on the attempt follow:
“Our age is retrospective. It builds the sepulchers of the fathers. It writes biographies, histories, and criticism. The forgoing generations beheld God and nature face to face; we, through their eyes. Why should not we enjoy an original relation to the universe?”
Ralph Waldo Emerson, “Nature”, Selected Essays, New York, 1985, page 35.

I spent a lot of my childhood in the company of ants. There is a big cable/electrical box complex in front of the house I grew up in where I would spend days playing with my little formic friends, narrowly avoiding dangerous wires. While it seemed like the height of interest for most kids was burning ants with a magnifying glass, I can’t remember ever doing that. Instead, I interested myself in their social aspects. How they, as a society, organized their tunnel system and reacted with certain stimuli.
three major factors would contribute to the success of such a test: strong potentiality, unrealized phenomenal nascence, and temporal and physical constrainment.
Simply based on the popular interest in fringe-science and folk-conciousness, the likely “virtual entity” candidate for such an experiment would seem to be a ghost, urban legend, or other widely recognized supernatural entity. The more widely recognized the entity the greater the potentiality. Such phantasms are popularly accepted as straddling the fence between forms of existence and non-existence anyway and would make ideal test subjects on the basis of “unrealized phenomenal nascence”.
In the area of temporal and physical constrainment it would be useful if the phantasm was traditionally associated with a particular geographic area to help limit uncertainties regarding spacial location which might occur upon nascence.
As an additional factor: it might be prefferable, if only for the purposes of provability, to choose some entity with qualities which are improbable through conventional scientific understanding, unsubstantiated by established historical prescident, yet undeniable as an entity in the phenomenal world. For example: bringing Abraham Lincolon or John Wilkes Booth into existence would be easy for skeptics to construe as a hoax (anyone can dress up in period costume and human cloning isn’t too far beyond the realm of what seems possible at this point). But if you could manage a gorgon or Paul Bunyan, who could doubt?
Yet another digression from the magine/PJ issue, but something I feel you guys would probably appreciate:
Someone on the Unknown Armies RPG e-mail list mentioned this Space Opera in Scientology thing and I fond it particularly fascinating.
Mini-review and obligatory digression.
Minor spoilers for various movies below.
The Brothers Grimm could’ve been worse, but it could’ve been better too. I think it’s safe to say that Gilliam isn’t hitting the top of his form with this one.
Continue reading Review: The Brothers Grimm (with a little The Village review thrown in)
Which begs the question: what principals would allow such a device to operate?
As already demonstrated certain sorts of fluctuations and effects at the quantum level can have direct and widespread consequences for macroscopic objects. And one member of a virtual particle/anti-particle pair may be culled off allowing the other to become an entelechy. It seems to me that a way only need be found to link these two effects together in an auspicious manner suitable to producing the particular macroscopic systems desired.
Similarly, other sorts of virtual entity/anti-entity pairs might be conjectured to exist but which normally cancel each other out with a net of zero effect on the universe. The trick would be to would be to cull the anti-entity while allowing the desired entity (or it’s component parts, or components which might give rise to such an entity) to escape into the universe.
One problem that may arise with this sort of process is that quantum level effects may take circuitous or otherwise undesirable routes to propegate their effects at the macroscopic level (ie. a “butterfly effect” type scenario). And basically the more particles involved (say an entire body vs. a few atoms) the more difficult it would be to predict and control the propegation of the effects.
Fortunately, there may be a solution of sorts to this challenge. As proven with the creation of Bose-Einstein Condensates, under certain circumstances a large number of particles can act as if they were a single entity. Having a large number of particles (or perhaps “clusters of precursor particles”) able to spring into existence as a single entity would simplify matters.
There may potentially be some odd issues with the manner in which Heisenberg’s principal of indeterminacy would or would not function when allowed to apply at the macroscopic scale on such massive quazi-fundamental particles. But there may be some ways around the more sticky (pun intended) aspects of this issue through the use of intentional quantum entanglement.
The only real remaining obstacle is that Bose-Einstein Condensates technically only exist at extremely low temperatures and when using homogeneous groups of particles. If a means can be conjectured and tested to temporarily create heterogeneous composition condensates with single-particle waveform properties then I think we could well be in business.