Anki: The Path to Super Saiyan Memory

Anki is an Open-source flashcard application, with desktop and mobile versions, and a sync state function between devices. The idea is simply to outsource physical flashcards into an application which then automates “spaced repetition”. The purported result is better memorization in less active time studying.

Spaced repetition with forgetting curves

The flashcard process goes like this: Attempt to get it right, then award yourself a fail, where you put it back in today’s pile, or give it a pass, where you put it forward a certain number of days. If this is the first time you’re seeing this card, it might only go forward 1 day. But, given that you succeed with recall next time you see the card, you’ll send it forward the previous interval times 2.5. This continues the next time you encounter the card, inflating the interval each time (today I just sent one 1.5 years into the future).  You can adjust that down by marking it “Hard” or forward by marking it “Easy”. Fail the card and it all starts again. I do buy into this process well enough. I can’t tell you how much time and effort I’ve wasted in college going over stuff I already know and got fatigued/bored by the time I get to the stuff I actually need reminding.

I’ve used Anki for a bunch of years now, but let’s get to that in a minute. Even though I’ve used it for a while, I recently expanded my usage due to reading an article about it, which I can’t even find now. Many articles say stuff like “Superpower” in the title. There’s a ton of hype online when people think about the possibilities of nearly effortlessly learning random things like all the bones in the human body or every last street name in San Francisco. Sure. But, the article did make me think that I can memorize more things I care about, like Linux/Vim/tmux commands. Perhaps going for an augmented memory at age 45 doesn’t show great timing. Or, perhaps, it shows perfect timing.

I first started using Anki closer to a decade ago while trying to brush up on and maintain some of my Chinese character knowledge. You can find shared decks made by others, so I went ahead and looked up one for the 3000 most common characters. Easy-peasy, right? It actually turned out to be a disaster.

The problems were 2-fold. First, and you’ll see this posted everywhere as a critique and caveat of Anki, is that Anki is not a learning platform. It’s just flashcards, a way to solidify learned content into memory. Contrast this with some of the language learning apps, which present content contextually if not just in some sort of explanatory way. Once understood, then flashcards are appropriate.

Next, whoever made the Chinese character decks I used (and now use) clearly has no expertise in learning or teaching Chinese. Whoever made the decks clearly took lists of Chinese characters and made 2 cards for each: one for character recognition and one for character recall. Character recall is the problem here, because simply putting the single-syllable romanized “word” isn’t enough to differentiate it from perhaps many other characters with the same sound.

I could go on about this, but it recalls something Tim once noted to me about Wikipedia’s problem. It’s a great and valuable tool for being free, but it’s often written by non-experts and therefore contains a good deal of inaccurate or imprecise info. Fortunately for me, I am someone who happens to have some expertise in Chinese language learning. I was able to just add context to the single-syllable “words” in the character recall decks. The upside to Anki not being a specially-curated enterprise app is you can always edit decks as you see fit.

What all this has to do with my previous post should be pretty clear. I promised my minimal effort plan to learn and retain the a bunch of historical sword morphology, but I had to explain Anki a bit first. Next post, I’ll go over creating an Anki deck for the Oakeshott Typology.

3 thoughts on “Anki: The Path to Super Saiyan Memory

  1. At Essex, an officemate lent me a copy of a book on memorization and study techniques. The memorization method was a guru-glorified set of pneumonic tricks, which didn’t quite work for me, but some of the study strategies stayed with me. One was mind mapping, which I’ve found helpful for thinking creatively. The other was that reading linear text with a pointer made for quicker reading. I tried this for a bit, and it didn’t stick with me, but it made me realize that annotation, which I had been doing since early undergrad, was a great way to learn and focus, especially with dense text dealing with complex ideas.

    The Anki system seems highly effective, but I can see how it would be a disaster without any pedological design of how the information was presented and scaffolded. In a way, I feel like my annotation techniques are like flash carding. The first step is annotating something or making a set of notes, and then the second step is rewriting those notes. The third step is orally referring to them and recounting the information. Generally, once I’ve done this three times, I tend to remember it.

  2. That’s very interesting. Yeah, it seems like what you’re doing with annotation is probably it’s own SRS (space repetition system). The average card in Anki spacing goes 1 day, 3 days, 8 days, after which you don’t see it for almost a month, meaning you should pretty much have it. Seems like your system hits it that 3 times pretty much the same.

  3. I always heard you have to see things 3 or 4 times to really get them.

    Think traditional classroom (I know, not always perfect). Lecture, take notes, do homework, review notes for exam. Maybe a lab to reinforce. IF it’s done right, you are getting information in multiple formats multiple times. I found in grad school it was very important for ME to take notes, not get a copy of the lecture notes. Then later in the semester, condense notes down into an another form.

Comments are closed.